|
AIDS is
different from all other diseases, infectious or not. For a start, it is not
even a disease at all. Its full name is Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
It is a condition of the human organism which allows disease to take hold
because the defence system is no longer active or efficient enough.
|
Master Formula |
 |
|
People do not die
of AIDS. They die of one of many (presently 29 recognized) illnesses that
all existed independently before AIDS, and that are usually overcome without
symptoms by people with an efficient immune system.
The condition we
now call AIDS has also existed always and might have been called phthisis in
a past era. It was very rare, however, and when it ended in death by one or
other recognizable disease, like cancer, tuberculosis, or pneumonia, the
underlying condition as such was not identified, and of course its causes
were never known. |
 |
Especially in Africa we see the old typical diseases of tropical countries
lacking in hygiene, education, and proper nutrition, now re-diagnosed as
AIDS, even without the availability of HIV-antibody tests.
|
The
official AIDS diagnosis (distinct from just being HIV-positive) is a
construct that has been changed several times since the documentation of the
first AIDS cases. It requires 1) a positive HIV-test; 2) the presence of one
of the 29 (to date) different illnesses that have been listed as companions
to, or a result of, AIDS; 3) a low T-cell count. |
|
This
amounts to a circular definition, which admits only AIDS-cases where certain
anti-bodies can be detected. All other AIDS-cases, with the same symptoms
and prognosis, are not called AIDS. Through this cunning - but totally
unscientific, even anti-scientific - dodge, it is claimed that in all
AIDS-cases HIV is present. Then this artificially conceived 100 percent
correlation is adduced as "proof" that HIV causes AIDS, and that AIDS is
caused by HIV.
|
If that
is proof of causation, then there is equally valid proof that it is the cock
that causes the Sun to rise! Every morning the Sun rises after the cock has
crowed. 100 percent correlation and always the same time sequence.
Consequently proof that it is the cock that brings the sun over the horizon
every morning! |
|
The
claim that HIV causes AIDS is actually LESS convincing than would be the
claim that the cock causes the Sun to rise, because the sunrise is at least
not subject to a selective definition, which considers it to have risen only
if the cock has actually crowed, which is exactly the construction made with
regards to AIDS.
|
Even so,
the correlation is one-sided, since a large number of people who have been
diagnosed as HIV-positive never by themselves become ill with AIDS. If this
sounds like a major inconvenience for the HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis, the
pharmaceutical and medical establishment has found a simple remedy for it in
forcing those who test positive for HIV to take the drug AZT (or other
similar drugs) under the pretext that the drug would "delay the onset of
AIDS", a progression which - without proof of any kind! - is proclaimed
inevitable with a positive HIV test. |
|
The fact
is that NO proof whatsoever exists, for either the assertion that testing
positive to HIV must lead to AIDS or the assertion that AZT will delay the onset
of AIDS. Both these claims are patently untrue. However, since AZT - and not HIV
- inevitably produces AIDS in those who take it long enough, the 100%
correlation - and thus the "proof" that HIV causes AIDS - is vindicated,
if the HIV-positive person takes AZT.
|
And just
think of the juicy profits from this stratagem to both the inventor of the
patented test method, and the manufacturer of the drug! And the
correspondingly fat "kick-backs" to those in medical authority who have
imposed this tale of horror on a trusting public and awarded a treatment
monopoly to handpicked drug manufacturers by refusing to authorize any other
forms of treatments. |
|
Incidentally, the test methods used to check for antibodies against the
hypothetical HIV are very unreliable and not specific to just one type of
virus. One of several admitted causes for false positive test results is
pregnancy, and yet fanciful statistical projections based principally
on a few HIV-antibody tests on precisely pregnant women is the basis for the
entire African AIDS hysteria.
As if
this were not enough to shake the very foundations of the reigning AIDS
dogma, highly qualified and experienced researchers in Germany and Australia
are pointing out that the whole retro-virus theory is nothing but a
laboratory construct, and that no proof exists that the so called HIV is
capable of causing any illness whatsoever, let alone all the damage
imaginatively attributed to it.
It is
important to know that there are a large number of AIDS cases (in the sense
of patients with a fatally inactive or malfunctioning immune system) where
no "HIV antibodies" are, or ever were, present. And on the other hand, there
are a vast number of people who have been diagnosed as "HIV-positive" who
have a sufficiently effective immune system to be in normal health, some of
them ever since the HIV-test was invented in 1984, provided - and this is
crucial - that they are not taking AZT or any similar drugs, nor are exposed
to toxic chemicals, and are sufficiently well nourished and generally
looking after themselves.
|
Besides,
having antibodies to a virus has up till now always signified that one is
immune to that particular virus, and consequently has nothing to worry
about. To give us antibodies for protection against infection is the
principle all vaccination is based on. To say that we now need a vaccine
against HIV makes no sense at all, since those testing positive already have
antibodies against HIV. Why would they want more anti-bodies to test
positive to? |
|
It should be noted,
that one of the many fraudulent claims made by the AIDS industry is that they
have isolated the HIV virus. So far, nobody has been able to isolate a single
virus from an AIDS patient that could be conclusively proven to be HIV. Not what
you think they told you, is it? Furthermore, the frequent reference to "viral
load" is another smoke screen of little or no value, that proves nothing about
the existence in the blood of a particular virus misnamed HIV.
The whole
hypothesis is based on a few indirect indices propped up by fantastic
speculation and imaginative conjecture, much of which goes against the very
grain of solidly established medical science.
|
II. THE HISTORY OF A I D S IN A NUTSHELL |
|
Towards the end of
1980, a researcher in Los Angeles, Dr. Michael Gottlieb, who was studying the
immune system, was introduced to a homosexual patient with immune deficiency
disease. Over the next six months or so, he found another four similar cases,
and in June 1981 he published a report on the first five documented AIDS cases
(though not yet called by this name).
The US health
authorities in the guise of the Communicable Disease Center (CDC) took immediate
notice and launched a theory, which has since been relentlessly reinforced by
all means and has led to the present official dogma about AIDS and the HIV.
Our
officially sanctioned medical science, being what it is, i.e. mechanistic,
reductionist and narrowly specialized, immediately argued in terms of a
single cause, preferably an invader such as a bacterium or a virus.
The Communicable
Disease Center (CDC), being what it is, namely specialized in infectious
disease, immediately saw an epidemic - from five cases! They must have been
desperate to find something to dig their teeth into! At that time official
medicine still knew very little about the human immune system and how it
functions, and to blame drugs or chemicals was the last thing it was
interested in.
Once
media - with the encouragement of the CDC - got hold of and blew up this
"gay disease" as a potential threat to the population at large, there was
naturally great pressure to find the cause and a remedy. The fame and money
awaiting the medical hero who could solve the mystery and save Mankind was a
powerful incentive for taking on the challenge.
|
In 1982
the French scientist Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute thought he had
discovered a new retrovirus and sent his findings to the prominent career
virologist Robert Gallo in the USA for an opinion. Gallo promptly took
advantage of Montagnier's trust, and ventured to claim the original
discovery as his own. For this he was later found guilty of "scientific
misconduct". |
|
By 1983
media had whipped up a public awareness that soon began to show signs of a
budding panic. A solution was becoming pressing.
|
With the official
support of the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Margaret Heckler,
Gallo held a press conference in April 1984, declaring that a new
retro-virus, which he claimed to have discovered in a (small) number of AIDS
patients, was the "probable" cause of AIDS.
The new retro-virus
was peremptorily named "the Human Immunodeficiency Virus" (HIV). The word
"probable" was soon forgotten, never to be admitted again. Margaret Heckler
proclaimed, "Today we add another miracle to the long honor roll of American
medicine and science". The cause of AIDS had been established by government
decree, and not by independent scientific research and consensus.
|
|
Incredible as it will sound to most, it is a fact that there is still NO
PROOF whatsoever of HIV causing AIDS, in spite of the ever-present dogmatic
pounding for over 15 years by media of the phrase "HIV, the virus that
causes AIDS".
Directly
after the press conference, Gallo patented his method for testing against
HIV antibodies, which has since made him a multi-millionaire. As will be
explained in the following, this test is not only grossly inadequate and
totally unnecessary (since the HIV causes no illness), but turns into an
insidious death trap for those who happen to test positive.
|
Now that
a cause had been assigned, a remedy had to be found. And one appeared on the
scene with lightning speed under the names of AZT, Ziduvine and Retrovir.
What few people know is that AZT was originally developed in the US in the
early l960ies as a treatment for cancer.
It was, however, at that time found
completely unsuited for human consumption, due to its extreme toxicity, and
was therefore not even patented but shelved and forgotten. A few years later
it was patented by the US National Institute of Health (NIH), but still not
used. |
|
When the
AIDS "epidemic" was launched by Gallo and the US government, AZT was
promptly dug up, sold to the pharmaceutical giant Burroughs-Welcome by the
US medical authorities who owned the patent, and rushed through the US drug
testing protocols at record speed, dispensing with normally required safety
procedures, to emerge as the only authorized medicine against AIDS.
|
AZT is
NOT an anti-viral medicine, as is deceitfully claimed, but a DNA chain
terminator or cell poison. In other words, it is an extremely toxic form of
chemotherapy which, if taken in large enough doses, or long enough, will
inevitably cause death by itself. The long list of very serious side effects
acknowledged by the manufacturer, many of them life-threatening, reads just
like the list of symptoms ascribed to full-blown AIDS. Anyone can check this
out by reading the information that the law requires the manufacturer to
provide. |
|
It is also
thought-provoking to observe that this drug, that for 20 years was rejected with
the motivation that its extreme toxicity made it unsuited for human consumption,
was now offered as the only authorized remedy to AIDS patients, who were all
identified as belonging to the socially undesirable "risk groups" male
homosexuals, intravenous drug addicts, Haitian immigrants, prostitutes and
hemophiliacs.
The latest and by
far the largest "risk group" targeted for the wildly profitable marketing of AZT
and its more recent companion drugs, is the entire African people, and
especially its pregnant mothers and newborn children. No wonder South Africa's
President is reacting; the first political leader with enough common sense to do
so.
|
AZT has carried one
of the highest price tags of any drug on the market, while at the same time
it must have been one of the cheapest to put into circulation, thanks to its
shady history. Talk about profiteering.
Every single
patient who has completed prescribed treatment with AZT has died after a
long time of the most horrible agony and suffering. AZT has been one of
Welcome's greatest profit makers, selling for hundreds of millions of
pounds, and making their shares soar on the Stock Exchange. |
|
By 1986,
two years after Gallo's press conference, alternative views on AIDS had
begun to appear in print, exposing a holistic approach to the crisis, but
these were effectively suppressed, and never even mentioned in professional
publications, nor in the general media.
|
In 1987 Dr. Peter
Duesberg, who was Professor of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University
of California at Berkeley, a distinguished member of the American Academy of
Science and probably the world's foremost expert on retro-viruses, stepped
forward and became the most authoritative advocate in the USA for an
alternative view.
He, and eventually
hundreds of top scientists and experienced health practitioners all over the
world, among them several Nobel Laureates, began to question most of the
postulates of the officially proclaimed AIDS doctrine. But their views have
consistently been denied publication in professional journals and are hardly
ever reported by mainstream media. Many of them have lost their positions
and research grants and suffered persecution. |
|
n the
year 2000, when the President of South Africa decided to invite some of these
"dissenting" scientists to a discussion panel in order to hear all the different
views on the causation and possible remedies for the syndrome, the AIDS industry
felt so threatened, that it published full page advertisements in the US
newspapers to counter "a few colleagues who claim that the cause of AIDS is in
doubt".
|
It
failed to mention that the mentioned "few colleagues" are now numbered in
the thousands and include some of the foremost experts in the field, among
them several Nobel laureates and professors at some of the most prestigious
universities. If this can escape as misrepresentation of facts, then the
continued statement, "There is no such scientific controversy" is nothing
less than a blatant brazen lie.
The advertisement is full of unsubstantiated
and deceptive assertions. Who do you think pays for this advertisement? -
The answer is "amfAR", a "Benefic" AIDS organization generously funded by
the manufacturer of AZT! |
|
Professor Duesberg claims that HIV cannot possibly cause AIDS, that AIDS is
not contagious at all, and that drugs of all kinds are the main factor for
the failure of the immune system, which we now call AIDS. Even Montagnier,
the original discoverer of the HIV, has declared that in his opinion the HIV
cannot alone cause AIDS. Duesberg further claims that by prescribing AZT to
treat HIV, doctors in fact produce AIDS in their patients. He provocatively
calls this "administering AIDS by prescription".
|
Professor Duesberg was now given the full political treatment of
heavy-handed suppression of his views through such means as refusal by
scientific journals to publish his papers, cancellation of his speaking
engagements at conferences, banning him from participating in TV programs
etc.
He was also submitted to strong pressure, including threats and bribes, from
the US health authorities to return to the fold and officially back the
virus dogma. The final blow was the withdrawal of his research grants.
|
|
Does
this sound like the freedom of expression inscribed in the US constitution?
Does this sound like freedom of science? - Doesn't it rather sound like
censorship and dictatorial powers over the minds of those who think
differently, including some of the most eminent scientists of the day?
Wouldn't you call this a monopoly on opinion and thought? A monopoly on
"truth" established by decree? - Could this game really have anything to do
with science?
The
dissemination of Duesberg´s soundly and solidly founded scientific
conclusions was in this way delayed and made more difficult, but it could
not be stopped. In spite of fighting against such very heavy odds, he has
been given increasing support from many hundreds of prominent independent
scientists and health professionals who are free from vested profit or
career interests and brave enough to incur the wrath of the profit- and
power-based establishment.
It
should be noted that those who question the official HIV-AIDS hypothesis
have nothing to gain by doing so. On the contrary, they are risking their
careers, their livelihoods, even their lives. In stark contrast, those who
fanatically and without scientific proof try to perpetrate the official AIDS
dogma, are making big money from it, are vested with power and prestige
because of it, and thus have everything to lose if it should become
discredited, as it should.
This was
a brief summary of the history of AIDS and its treatment up till recently.
Now I wish to share with you some independently researched, mostly
unrecognized factors in AIDS that have the potential of changing the course,
not only of the treatment of AIDS, but of Western medicine as we know it.
II. SHEDDING LIGHT ON THE MYSTERY -THE HIDDEN BenZENE CONNECTION
|
At the
beginning of the AIDS "epidemic", one of the high risk groups identified,
was Haitian immigrants. How these could have anything in common with the
prime high risk group, identified as young homosexual men in California and
New York, was always a mystery. (Except, perhaps, that both these categories
may have been deemed undesirable by certain powerful people in the
establishment). |
|
Several
years of research by C.S. Byrnes and Jeremy F. Selvey of the People's
International Health Project (PIHP) and Project AIDS International in Los
Angeles, California, into what they call "the Benzene link", has finally
shed light on this mystery. This research has also gone a long way towards
explaining a number of other mysterious illnesses affecting the immune
system, as well as the nervous system. All of them were at first thought to
be infectious diseases, usually attributed to a new virus, just like AIDS.
|
Byrnes
discovered that the US immigration authorities treated Haitian immigrants
against parasites with clioquinol, a Benzene product. Incidentally the same
drug has been heavily marketed in Africa, especially in Zaire and Angola.
Recent research by the physiologist and bio-physicist Dr. Hulda Regehr Clark
has furthermore established that precisely the combination of Benzene and
some common intestinal parasites will cause AIDS, as well as various forms
of cancer (without the AIDS-defining presence of HIV antibodies).
Kaposi's
sarcoma was one of the most typical symptoms of early AIDS cases among the
gay population of the US. However, it has never appeared among
heterosexuals. So what is the virus like, that distinguishes between
homosexuals and heterosexuals? |
|
Byrnes
and Selvey discovered that a new anal lubricant produced specially for the
gay community was introduced in 1978, barely two years before the first AIDS
cases were reported. It turns out that this lubricant contains Benzene
derivates, the absorption of which was enhanced by "Poppers" (amyl nitrite), a
drug US homosexuals began using in the l970ies in order to increase sexual
pleasure.
It is further
considered that pharmaceuticals taken via the rectum are more effectively
absorbed than those taken orally; hence the use of suppositories in medicine.
|
But
there is more to it. It has been observed from inside the homosexual
communities, that it was mostly the partner who let himself be penetrated
anally (i.e. the "passive" partner), who fell ill, while the "active"
partner remained healthy. Also, "passive" homosexuals were harder hit, the
more promiscuous they were. This does not make much sense in an infectious
disease, but it does coincide with the use of anal lubricants. |
|
Finally,
PIHP has shown that for several years it was only in the USA that
homosexuals came down with Kaposi's sarcoma. Every AIDS patient outside of
the US who developed Kaposi's sarcoma was found to have spent at least a
year or so in the US. Then, as the new lubricant was made available by
mail-order in European countries, Kaposi's sarcoma started appearing there
as well, but again only among homosexuals.
|
In his
book with Bryan Ellison, Why We Will NEVER Win the War on AIDS, Professor
Duesberg pointed out the link between Benzene derivates and the so called
SMON (Subacute Myelo-Optic Neuropathy) "epidemic" in Japan, for a long time
thought to be a virus infection but eventually proved to be caused by a
pharmaceutical product manufactured by Ciba-Geigy.
A Japanese researcher's
claims to have isolated a SMON virus turned out to be false. This "epidemic"
went on for some 15 years and many thousands of people became paralyzed,
demented, or died, from their medical prescription, before the truth was
discovered and the drug was finally outlawed in most countries. |
|
Duesberg
and Ellison also refer, like Selvey, to the infamous Pellagra "plague" known
from the 18th century. In 1937 it was finally deemed to be caused by vitamin
deficiency and not bacteria as previously believed, but it did not disappear
in the US till the l970ies. It mostly hit people on a basic corn diet,
supposedly because corn does not contain niacin, a vitamin of the B-complex
necessary for vital functions of the body, especially for the skin, nervous
system and brain.
|
A link
has now been established between pellagra and Benzene, in the form of a
bleaching agent containing hexachloral Benzene used to bleach corn flour in
many parts of the US right up to the l970ies. |
|
|
Selvey´s
and Byrnes´s research covers no less than five different illnesses that
were all at first assumed to be infectious, the earliest of which was
pellagra. |
|
In 1981
another "epidemic" broke out in Spain, the victims of which showed very similar
symptoms to those of AIDS. For a long time it was assumed that it was an
infectious disease caused by a virus, since it hit people in clusters within the
same family or social group.
|
It took
years of serious detective work before it was finally established that the
cause was a contaminated oil used for cooking, sold by street peddlers and
not by regular shops. The oil had been diluted to widen the profit margin
and it contained Benzene derivates. Many died, others fell seriously ill in
AIDS-like symptoms, including fever, night sweats, muscle wasting, cough,
cramps, pneumonia, hepatitis, cerebral oedemas, neuropathy and multiple
secondary infections. |
|
PIHP
have further launched the theory that the fashionable "Yuppie flue" or
chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) - for some time wrongly attributed to the
Barr-Epstein virus - has similar, Benzene-related, causes, for which they
provide several convincing arguments.
|
The
American medical journalist Neenyah Ostrom has been investigating Chronic
Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) for over 8 years and has published several books on
the subject. In one book she lists 100 pieces of medical evidence linking
CFS to AIDS. |
|
The
following is a quote from an interview with Neenyah Ostrom in early 1995 in
the CFIDS Commentary, comparing CFS patients with AIDS patients:
|
"The
point I am making is that what is seen in both sets of patients is immune
dysfunction. - 'But CFS patients don't die from their illness,' people
sometimes argue with me. I have two answers to that objection. |
|
|
The
first answer is: Sometimes they do die from their illness. Paul Cheney
reported in his February 1993 FDA testimony that not only had four of his
patients developed 'cases of AIDS-defining opportunistic infections
including MAI and pneumocystiis pneumonia and two cases of spontaneous
esophageal candidiasis', he had also had three patients die over a six-month
period from 'intercurrent infections'. Translated into AIDS-speak, those,
too, are opportunistic infections. - Additionally, if a CFS patient develops
cancer because his or her immune system is unable to defend against it, or
pneumonia or heart disease (which seems to develop in CFS patients), the
patient isn't said to have died of CFS, but of heart disease, cancer or
pneumonia. |
|
|
The
second answer is: If CFS patients were given the extraordinarily toxic drugs
that AIDS patients are given, I suspect that they might die at a comparable
rate. All of the anti-retroviral drugs given to AIDS patients - AZT, DDI
etc. - destroy their bone marrow and livers, cause neuropathy, nausea and
all kinds of health problems that the patient didn't have before taking the
drug. |
|
|
Even
the profylactic drugs given to AIDS patients - such as Bactrim for pneumonia
- are very, very toxic. |
|
|
CFS
patients, like AIDS patients, are extraordinarily sensitive to chemicals,
which includes pharmaceutical drugs. I think that if AIDS patients were not
given these toxic drugs, their illness would more closely resemble CFS, and
that if CFS patients were given these toxic drugs, their illness would
suddenly look a lot more like AIDS." |
|
V. A I D S BY PRESCRIPTION
|
To treat
a state of chemical poisoning with more poison makes no sense. Treating
immune deficiency - whatever its cause - with AZT or other forms of highly
toxic chemotherapy that kills off the remaining cells of an already damaged
immune system, makes even less sense. And yet, this is the "treatment"
imposed on innocent trusting patients by our medical authorities. |
|
|
Professor Duesberg and a growing number of independent scientists claim that
administering AZT to healthy HIV-positive people, amounts to administering
AIDS by prescription. |
|
In
England the manufacturer of AZT, Burroughs Welcome, was sued by the widow
of a hemophiliac, who died after 18 months on their drug. The point is that
he was diagnosed in 1985, and it is believed that he became "HIV-positive"
already in 1983, but he had no symptoms of any kind and was in normal good
health until he started taking AZT in August 1989.
|
The
reason he began to take the drug was that his doctors insisted that since he
was HIV-positive, he would inevitably develop AIDS sooner or later, so the
drug was administered in order to "delay the onset of AIDS". |
|
A week
after he was put on AZT, he became sick, and 18 months later he died.
|
Professor Duesberg and others have convincingly demonstrated that not only
does AZT not save any lives, but those who take it, die sooner than those
who do not take it. Along with several other researchers he has also shown
how the scanty test results in favour of AZT were manipulated and
misrepresented. |
|
So it is
not, as the manufacturer has been claiming, that patients live longer with
AZT and eventually die in spite of the drug, but quite the contrary: the
drug aggravates their condition and will, with prolonged use, even cause
death all by itself in previously healthy people.
|
While we
are on the subject of hemophiliacs, we find another anomaly: Very very few
of the wives of HIV-positive hemophiliacs have become HIV-positive, and none
has to my knowledge become ill with AIDS. Now, if it is an infectious
disease transmitted by sexual intercourse, how come the wives of the sick
men are not infected? |
|
V.
THE "VOODOO EFFECT" AND MENTAL DEPRESSION -THE MIND-BODY CONNECTION IN A I D S
|
When
discussing the various factors that contribute to the development of AIDS,
we must not underestimate the role of low self-esteem, emotional rejection,
guilt, fear, failure and loneliness, all of which cause mental-emotional
depression, which in turn is one of the most powerful factors to negatively
affect the immune system. |
|
As can
be readily appreciated, the mere pronunciation of the HIV-AIDS diagnosis,
supposedly leading to a secure and inescapable death, while putting near and
dear at risk too, can have a devastating effect on the immune system, and
may then become a self-fulfilling prophesy and a death sentence, even
without administration of the lethal AZT drug.
Depression and drugs may or may not be related. A depressed state of mind
and low self-esteem is often the reason for resorting to drugs in the first
place. On the other hand, falling into the habit of drug abuse in pursuit of
pleasure, or from curiosity, can lead to such depletion of available energy,
typically through overload of the adrenal glands, that a depressive state
and a malfunctioning immune system follows as the physiological result.
The two
can also be independent but coincident. For instance, someone having taken
drugs for some time, thereby straining the immune system, may be apparently
doing all right until s/he experiences the break-up of an emotional
relationship, whether by death or for other reasons, and sinks into a deep
depression. Shortly afterwards s/he is diagnosed with AIDS, and from then on
a vicious circle begins with no hope of survival.
|
From the
picture emerging of the typical AIDS patient's situation, we now discern
another co-factor to take into account, that we may call subconscious
programming. |
|
It is actually not
uncommon for people to unconsciously program themselves to die. Some barter with
God, saying for instance that if God will only allow them to live to such and
such age, or till their children are grown or married etc., then they will
gladly accept death after that. And sure enough, when the condition is
fulfilled, they die.
Not just like that,
but from a disease that their immune system chooses not to cope with, mostly
some form of cancer. Others may at some point in their life feel that the
situation in which they find themselves is unacceptable for some deeply personal
reason, and so they unconsciously commit a form of subtle suicide. Their immune
system stops functioning, and they die of some form of cancer, or from what in
AIDS is called opportunistic infection. I have seen many examples of this.
This
phenomenon may be compared to certain black magic practices, such as Voodoo,
when a spell is cast on somebody who firmly believes in it. Accepting the
validity of the spell, the victim subconsciously programs him/her/self to
die, and - hocus-pocus - death occurs as predicted.
In the case of
AIDS, public hysteria works in two ways. For one thing it accentuates the
alienation often already experienced for other reasons, e.g. by homosexuals,
prostitutes or drug addicts. Once AIDS is diagnosed and it becomes known,
the victim is likely not only to lose his job even if he is well enough to
work, but also to be aggressively cut off from even being near most people.
He will be looked
upon by most ignorant people as an evil and dangerous bringer of Death,
which further accentuates his feeling of alienation and hopelessness, and
sinks him ever deeper into a depression.
At the
same time he is subjected to the general consensus that AIDS is incurable
and that there is no hope. Officially nobody has ever been cured of AIDS; it
is just a waiting game. Sooner or later - the maximum time suggested first
was about 5 years - death will come. This - though not openly declared - is
the message the patient receives consciously and unconsciously, day and
night, from doctors and nurses, from family and friends, from public media.
The highly poisonous chemotherapy administered by orthodox doctors and
hospitals adds heavily to the burden.
Even his
close ones, who see no hope, may begin to signal subliminally that they too
suffer, that the patient is a burden, and that since he has to die anyway,
he might as well get on with it. Sooner or later he will be so physically
weak and emotionally depressed that he just gives up, programs himself to
die and accepts death as a redeemer.
How can
we expect anyone to recover from AIDS under such circumstances? It takes
superhuman psychological strength and immutable independence from
environmental influences to fight such odds and recover. Yet some have done
it, though media won't tell us about it. Officially they are quietly
awaiting their time.
VI. RUSSIAN ROULETTE - A SCIENTIFIC GAME OF STATISTICS
One of
the allegedly rock solid pillars of modern "scientific" medicine is
Statistics. Lay people possess a point of view of their own, and popular
wisdom has it that there are three kinds of lies of progressive gravity:
ordinary lies, damned lies, and - worst of all - statistics. And there is no
doubt that a clever stati-stician can work magic's with numbers and create
the illusion of proving or disproving almost anything.
I am a
great admirer of statistics for use by Governments in assessing demographic
development, or by insurance companies to calculate the size of their
premiums, but to use it for diagnosis and medical treatment of individual
human beings is playing Russian roulette. However scientific that now may
be.
|
Precisely with regard to diagnosing AIDS, I have a dramatic illustration of
this: A new oral, saliva-based test for HIV was approved in 1995 by the US
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The test was reported to be 98%
accurate. Since in our culture we are hypnotized by numbers and quantities,
percentages and majorities, this will sound reassuring to most people. But
what can that statistical truth mean for individual people in real life?
Let's take an example. |
|
In a sample of the
average American population, the estimate for HIV prevalence is in the order of
0.04%, or 4 per 10,000 people. Assuming we test 100,000 persons, we would then
expect to find 40 true HIV positive persons. This means that the remaining
99,960 persons are HIV negative. However, since the test is only 98% accurate,
it may falsely identify 2% of these 99,960 people as HIV positive. That is 1,999
persons! So out of 2,039 people who may test positive, only 40 are actually
positive.
That means 98% of
those identified by the test as "HIV positive" are not positive at all. In other
words, the test, that is said to be 98% accurate and thus approved for
commercial use, is in fact 98% inaccurate, looked at from the point of view of
those who tested positive.
Imagine the fate of
those 1,999 healthy people, who will be told they will get AIDS sooner or
later and bullied and intimidated by the medical establishment into taking
AZT to "delay the onset of AIDS". Quite apart from the horrendous expenses
this will imply (and profits to the pharmaceutical business), how many of
them do you think will survive such an ordeal? Such is the devilishly cruel
scenario Gallo and the US medical authorities have set in motion:
The whole
population is scared into taking the test, and all who test positive are
hard-sold the lethal AZT treatment, leading to certain death. In spite of
leading scientists affirming that even those who really do have
HIV-antibodies in their blood run no more risk of dying from AIDS, than
those who don't.
All this
shows how, not only useless but life-threatening, it can be to have a so
called "AIDS test" (actually only an HIV-antibody test) performed. Not only
can the medical establishment do nothing to save the unfortunate ones
declared positive, but in most cases it will do its best to demonstrate
"scientifically" through its treatment - and at exorbitant costs - that HIV
= AIDS = DEATH.
It
doesn't take a mathematical genius to figure out how many billions of
dollars the pharmaceutical companies and their collaborating doctors can
make on such tests, that they try to frighten the entire population into
taking. Far more than the 500 - 600 million dollars a year that Welcome's
drug AZT has brought in on account of those diagnosed as either HIV-positive
or suffering from full-blown AIDS, not a single one of whom was cured by the
drug.
Is there
any hope for all those who get sucked into the official pharmaco-political
profit mill as HIV-sus-pects? - Ready access to unbiased and honest
information and to holistic common sense - not easily come by - seems to be
the only way out of the grand AIDS tragedy. It is nearly two decades too
late to avert it.
|
If statistics show
that AIDS-sufferers live longer now than they used to, do not let yourself
be lulled into believing that this is due to scientific advances in treating
AIDS. There are two reasons: One is that when AZT was first introduced,
very high doses were prescribed, which finished off the patients quite fast,
usually in 1 - 3 years. Eventually it was decided to reduce the recommended
doses given, with the result that the patients now stay alive longer.
So they do not live
longer because they get better medicines. They live longer because they get
less of the "medicines". The other reason is simply that many AIDS patients
secretly go for alternative, holistic treatments instead of drugs, or
combine the two, and thus manage to escape or postpone their death
sentences. |
|
I have a
dream: That enough of us health practitioners muster the courage to think
independently and call the bluffs, causing Integrity and Truth, Reason and
Compassion to prevail over prejudice, greed and power politics in medicine.
VII. HERE IS HOW TO CURE A I D S:
1. The
very first thing to do for anyone suffering from AIDS is to stop exposing
the body to all kinds of chemicals and pharmaceutical products. The most
important thing of all is to immediately stop taking any chemotherapy like
AZT (Retrovir, Ziduvudine) DDI etc. Antibiotics and steroids have to be
stopped also, but may have to be discontinued gradually, depending on the
current medical status of the patient.
Also immediately
and completely stop exposure to all kinds of petroleum-based products,
solvents, varnishes, disinfectants, chemicals to preserve wood, etc. The
same goes for injections, unless necessary for life sustenance, especially
intravenous drugs of all kinds. All insecticides are killers, and not only
of insects.
Some pharmaceutical
drugs against parasites belong in this category. Attention must also be
given to chemically treated drinks and foods, including tap water
(particularly if it is fluoridated), so called "light" drinks containing
artificial sweeteners like aspartame, and decaffeinated coffee.
|
4. The
body and the immune system must be rebuilt with the right food, herbs,
vitamins, minerals, amino-acids, enzymes etc., guaranteed free of all
pollutants and harmful preservatives, solvents or other chemicals. |
|
6.
Another treatment said to be very effective is so called photoluminescence,
i.e. ultra-violet (UV) irradiation of the patient's blood, as described by
Dr. William Campbell Douglass in his book (see references below). In a
similar category, we have intravenous Ozone treatment.
|
7. Last
but not least, it is necessary to give close attention to the patient's
psycho-emotional status, since depression is a serious complication where
the immune system is involved. A positive attitude and something to live
for, is crucial for survival. And Love is probably the greatest healer of
all. |
|
Unless inner
organs have been irreversibly damaged by toxic "medication", the described
treatment will produce a cure and restore health. Still testing positive in
antibody tests for some time after that is normal and of no concern. It does
NOT mean that you have AIDS, or that you will ever get it.
P.S. Please
observe that a mother's immune cells are normally and naturally transmitted to
her unborn child. Thus a child born to a "HIV-positive" mother should have
antibodies from the mother until it has had time to build up it own immune
system. But these antibodies show inherited immunity, and not infection! To
treat such a mother, or such a child, with lethal chemotherapy in order to kill
the immune cells, is an attempt to murder, even if it is done from ignorance.
When it was
discovered that children who had been born HIV-positive, after some time no
longer tested positive, there were exclamations, bewilderment, and confusion...
Why, this is the norm, and it only shows that what they tested positive to, was
only antibodies transmitted by the mother, and no disease.
Ben Ash comment:
My recommendations for people who are HIV-positive and want to prevent
the onset of AIDS, as well as for those who are suffering the symptoms of
AIDS are:
1. Stop taking sugar, coffee, preservatives, Alcohol.
2. Stop taking of toxic and carcinogenic chemicals,
especially African beer and nitrite inhalants ("poppers"). Nitrites are
cytotoxic chemicals which destroy the immune system and cause cancer. Nitrites are likely the cause of Kaposi's sarcoma and a major
cause of AIDS.
3. Stop ingestion of all recreational or addictive
drugs. All psychoactive drugs disrupt cell metabolism, and
many of them are immuno-suppressive, that is, they suppress or destroy the
immune system. (This is especially true of intravenous drugs.)
4. Stop smoking and alcohol consumption.
Cigarette "tar" (Benzopyrene) is a powerful carcinogen and both it and
nicotine are cytotoxic. Alcohol opens the "blood-brain" barrier, allowing
toxic chemicals in the bloodstream to attack brain cells. Both smoking and
drinking harm the immune system.
Please do not forget to bookmark the site.
The general misconception
